[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9929d2390806262252k54071ab5tbb8e515e23ff68c3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:52:24 -0700
From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pl@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] e1000e: fix EEH recovery during reset on PPC
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> Jeff Kirsher wrote:
>>
>> EEH is not recovering in a reasonable amount of time on PPC during
>> e1000e_down().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
>> index ccb8ca2..0320925 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
>> @@ -2535,7 +2535,8 @@ void e1000e_down(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
>> adapter->link_speed = 0;
>> adapter->link_duplex = 0;
>> - e1000e_reset(adapter);
>> + if (!pci_channel_offline(adapter->pdev))
>> + e1000e_reset(adapter);
>> e1000_clean_tx_ring(adapter);
>> e1000_clean_rx_ring(adapter);
>
> IMO for this type of change, you should consider putting all these changes
> into a single patch.
>
> It's exactly the same logical change, so no need to split it up into three
> patches.
>
Ok, thank. I will keep that in mind for future patches.
--
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists