[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48648618.5060900@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:18:00 +0800
From: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Eric Miao <eric.miao@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] pxa: make littleton to use the new smc91x platform
data
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Eric Miao wrote:
>> From: Eric Miao <eric.miao@...vell.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@...vell.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/littleton.c | 9 +++++++++
>> drivers/net/smc91x.h | 3 ++-
>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> The rest of the patches seem OK.
>
> What do ARM people prefer -- should I ACK this series, and let it be
> merged via an ARM tree?
>
Well, I guess there are still some smc91x patches around and I'm not
sure if they will go inside the next merge window. So ideally, it'll
be best for "smc91x: *" patches go through the net-2.6, and I can
manage the rest to go through Russell's tree.
If you are OK with this, I'll send the smc91x specific patches to
you, together with Nico's Ack and a minor modification suggestion.
And either way will work if you prefer this to go through Russell's
arm tree.
> The series is mainly platform-oriented rather than net-oriented.
>
>
Yes, indeed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists