[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4869FDB3.1040400@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:49:39 +0800
From: Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
NETDEV <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: v2 [PATCH net-next 5/7] ipv4: Check return of dev_set_allmulti
Patrick McHardy said the following on 2008-7-1 17:40:
> Wang Chen wrote:
>> allmulti might overflow.
>> Commit: "netdevice: Fix promiscuity and allmulti overflow" in net-next
>> makes
>> dev_set_promiscuity/allmulti return error number if overflow happened.
>>
>> Here, we check the positive increment for allmulti to get error return.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
>> index 11700a4..ba0280f 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
>> @@ -398,6 +398,7 @@ static int vif_add(struct vifctl *vifc, int mrtsock)
>> struct vif_device *v = &vif_table[vifi];
>> struct net_device *dev;
>> struct in_device *in_dev;
>> + int err;
>>
>> /* Is vif busy ? */
>> if (VIF_EXISTS(vifi))
>> @@ -435,7 +436,9 @@ static int vif_add(struct vifctl *vifc, int mrtsock)
>> if ((in_dev = __in_dev_get_rtnl(dev)) == NULL)
>> return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>> IPV4_DEVCONF(in_dev->cnf, MC_FORWARDING)++;
>> - dev_set_allmulti(dev, +1);
>> + err = dev_set_allmulti(dev, 1);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>
> Missing error handling for VIFF_REGISTER and VIFF_TUNNEL case.
>
will do.
seems
> if ((in_dev = __in_dev_get_rtnl(dev)) == NULL)
should do error handling too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists