netdev - Re: [RFC] UDP SndbufErrors interface and the /proc/net/udp interface.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wsk5ucu2.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date:	Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:18:45 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	"Ian Brown" <ianbrn@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] UDP SndbufErrors interface and the /proc/net/udp interface.

"Ian Brown" <ianbrn@...il.com> writes:
>
> I wonder: would such a patch (form me or others) in needed ? Or will
> it be rejected because this idea is not good ?
> In case this idea is not good, I wonder what is the reason for it.

One possible reason against it is that struct sock size is relatively 
critical for memory consumption and there's usually some resistance
against adding more fields for it.

That might be overriden by a very clear use case.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html