netdev - Re: [RFC]: net-sched 00/05: dynamically sized class hashes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <486B54B7.2060100@trash.net>
Date:	Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:13:11 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Martin Devera <devik@....cz>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC]: net-sched 00/05: dynamically sized class hashes

Martin Devera wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
>> From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>> Date: Tue,  1 Jul 2008 16:34:11 +0200 (MEST)
>>
>>> Only RFC at this point because they haven't been tested thoroughly yet
>>> and depend on the filter destruction fixes I sent this morning, but any
>>> review (especially of 4/5, the htb_delete changes) is welcome.
>>
>> These patches look fine to me.
>>
>> I haven't investigated the correctness of the details of patch
>> 4 yet, sorry :-)  Maybe someone else will be able to.
>>
> 
> It seems ok to me. I even can't remember why to destroy in class order :-)
> Interestingly, once you do this patch then children/siblings list-heads
> are used only in htb_parent_last_child and to detect empty class.
> Thus we could remove children/siblings lists altogether ane keep only
> children counter.
> I can't believe it is so simple, what do you think, Patrick ?

Yes, it looks like that would work. I'll give it a try :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html