netdev - Re: [PATCH] Setup PHYs for rtl8101/2(e) hardware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080702215059.GA1378@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jul 2008 23:50:59 +0200
From:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To:	Mario_Limonciello@...l.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Edward Hsu <edward_hsu@...ltek.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Setup PHYs for rtl8101/2(e) hardware

Mario_Limonciello@...l.com <Mario_Limonciello@...l.com> :
[...]
> In comparing the differences with the Realtek release r8101-1.008.05-1
> of their r8101 driver, I found a handful of differences in  the startup
> procedures of the r8169 driver.  I isolated two sets of fixes that get
> rid of transient errors when loading the drivers.

(please restrain your lines to ~80 cols and Cc: Edward)

May I ask where did you got r8101-1.008.05-1 ? I only have
r8101-1.007.00 from Realtek's ftp (dated 21/04/2008).

Judging from r8101-1.007.00, I would say that your change is almost
right but that it can overlap some existing devices. This remark may
be irrelevant if there are enough differences between r8101-1.007.00
and r8101-1.008.05-1 though.

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html