[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8763rlsxi3.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:24:20 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Cc: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] support for IEEE 1588
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com> writes:
>
> I've not had a good emily litella moment in at least a week, so I'll
> ask - if the clock in the hardware generating the timestamp and the
> clock in the host aren't synchronized in _some_ way, what benefit is
> there to putting the hardware's timestamp in there?
The point is to synchronize them using a high quality data stamp.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists