[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080708.015548.127198943.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 01:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: romieu@...zoreil.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net-next-2.6 reverts.... PLEASE READ
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:01:06 +0200
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> :
> [...]
> > Some defconfig files got modified in the NAPI config option removal
> > commits that went in yesterday, and that's not supposed to happen.
>
> Is it a matter of keeping the option for a longer time or should they
> not go away under any circumstance ?
The issue is that defconfig updates should stay out of the
subsystem trees.
Otherwise we get conflicts with the arch maintainer trees,
and also "make oldconfig" works perfectly fine without
the defconfig change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists