netdev - Re: [RFC 08/11] remove CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1215542523.3670.4.camel@johannes.berg>
Date:	Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:42:03 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 08/11] remove CONFIG_KMOD from net


> > Eh, no. Not unless I also always compile in dev_load, which as of now
> > depends on CONFIG_MODULES. In fact, another hunk in this series makes it
> > a static inline when CONFIG_MODULES=n so that callers don't need to take
> > care of #ifdef'ing it.
> 
> Look at include/linux/module.h:
> 
> ...
> #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> ...
> #define EXPORT_SYMBOL(sym)                                      \
>         __EXPORT_SYMBOL(sym, "")
> ...
> #else /* !CONFIG_MODULES... */
> #define EXPORT_SYMBOL(sym)
> ...

Oh, right, I forgot I was dealing with CONFIG_MODULES and treated it
just like another config option, thanks.

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)