[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200807091715.25464.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 17:15:25 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: Persistent devices can get stuck in xoff state
Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2008 schrieb Max Krasnyansky:
> The scenario goes like this. App stops reading from tun/tap.
> TX queue gets full and driver does netif_stop_queue().
> App closes fd and TX queue gets flushed as part of the cleanup.
> Next time the app opens tun/tap and starts reading from it but
> the xoff state is not cleared. We're stuck.
> Normally xoff state is cleared when netdev is brought up. But
> in the case of persistent devices this happens only during
> initial setup.
Thats interesting. I believe we have seen exactly this behaviour
with KVM and lots of preallocated tap devices.
[...]
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -576,6 +576,11 @@ static int tun_set_iff(struct file *file, struct ifreq
*ifr)
> file->private_data = tun;
> tun->attached = 1;
>
> + /* Make sure persistent devices do not get stuck in
> + * xoff state */
> + if (netif_running(tun->dev))
> + netif_wake_queue(tun->dev);
> +
> strcpy(ifr->ifr_name, tun->dev->name);
> return 0;
I think that patch looks ok, but I am curious why you dont clear the xoff
state on application close at the same time when the TX queue gets flushed?
Christian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists