lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0807100258y1dfef681w7b293779fc1a12f4@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:58:11 +0200
From:	"Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To:	"Mattias Nissler" <mattias.nissler@....de>,
	"Stefano Brivio" <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rc80211_pid: Fix fast_start parameter handling

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Mattias Nissler <mattias.nissler@....de> wrote:
> This removes the fast_start parameter from the rc_pid parameters information
> and instead uses the parameter macro when initializing the rc_pid state. Since
> the parameter is only used on initialization, there is no point of making
> exporting it via debugfs. This also fixes uninitialized memory references to
> the fast_start and norm_offset parameters detected by the kmemcheck utility.
> Thanks to Vegard Nossum for reporting the bug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mattias Nissler <mattias.nissler@....de>
> ---
>
> Updated patch description. Any more comments? Stefano? John?
>
> Mattias

Hi,

I've tested the patch now. This was my config:

CONFIG_MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT_PID=y
CONFIG_MAC80211_RC_PID=y

and I'm using b43 driver successfully:

CONFIG_B43=y
CONFIG_B43_PCI_AUTOSELECT=y
CONFIG_B43_PCICORE_AUTOSELECT=y
CONFIG_B43_DEBUG=y

This works too:

# cat /debug/ieee80211/phy0/rc80211_pid/*
15
9
15
3
125
0
0
3
14

I guess you may put Tested-by: if this seems enough to verify that the
patch causes no other harm.

Can any of the net people acknowledge the reception of this patch? If
it doesn't make it for 2.6.26, we should at least Cc stable.


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ