netdev - Re: REDIRECT in nat OUTPUT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080713140930.GA23238@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date:	Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:09:30 +0400
From:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Subject: Re: REDIRECT in nat OUTPUT

On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 05:40:25PM +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko (denys@...p.net.lb) wrote:
> Seems i found something. After issuing ethtool -K lo tso on i got significant performance improvement.
> Why it is not on by default?
> Without it performance is VERY poor.

TSO over loopback turns to be GSO, which allows to aggregate multiple
packets into single frame. If system is not CPU bound, then it is likely
REDIRECT problem. If I understood you corerctly, loopback performance is
always good without REDIRECT, but fails to miserable level when
apprpriate rule is used?

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html