[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <487B18CD.5020502@katalix.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:13:49 +0100
From: James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>
To: Philip Craig <philipc@...pgear.com>
CC: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@....fi>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bridging with gre tunnel
Philip Craig wrote:
> Timo Teräs wrote:
> I posted a cleaner version that's similar to what the old patch
> did, see http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=115449948503549&w=2
>
> But I don't think that is the right approach:
> - it forces you to use bridging if you only want ethernet over GRE
> - the change fundamentally has nothing to do with bridging
I agree.
> It could be a new device that sits on top of GRE and simply does
> ethernet encapsulation then passes it to the raw GRE device.
This would be my preferred approach. There are other drivers that use a
netdev to do some encap/decap processing on packets which are then
passed on to another driver, e.g. macvlan, and it works well.
--
James Chapman
Katalix Systems Ltd
http://www.katalix.com
Catalysts for your Embedded Linux software development
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists