netdev - Re: [rfc] new sk_buff member: hwstamp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:25:59 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rfc] new sk_buff member: hwstamp

Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com> writes:

> So, would such a patch be considered for inclusion? Or maybe there is a 
> better way of doing the above?

You only need this between the driver and the socket recvmsg(), don't you?

One possible alternative (I admit I haven't thought all the implications
through) would be to use a second magic internal skb for this which has the 
same UDP header, but as only payload the time stamp. Disadvantage would
be the requirement to do header parsing in the driver, but often
hardware does that already.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html