[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080718090951.GP6875@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:09:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [bug, netconsole, SLUB] BUG skbuff_head_cache: Poison
overwritten
* Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> wrote:
> > Does SLUB have a debug check at freeing time? If so, how does it work
> > and why didn't it caught use after free there?
>
> You can't detect use after free before the object is actually free'd
> ;-)
yeah, we want to check use-after free at the next allocation point -
i.e. as late as possible to gather all corruptions that happened
meanwhile.
We could in theory have a SLUB debug mode where a SCHED_IDLE kernel
thread would periodically check all free objects (of that CPU) in the
background to ensure their integrity. That would catch corruptions
sooner, with a possibly still meaningful context to print out. [right
after the IRQ or process that corrupts them finishes running]
It could also be hooked into ftrace to print out the last few hundred
kernel function calls executed prior any corruption. ftrace/slub-debug
plugin perhaps?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists