netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs_enet: MDIO on GPIO support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E7FD62BF-C2BB-4803-87AB-91DD7AB8FD0C@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:40:10 -0500
From:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@...-semaphore.com>
Cc:	Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@...mvista.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs_enet: MDIO on GPIO support


On Jul 18, 2008, at 4:26 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> On Thursday 26 June 2008, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:21:23 +0200
>> Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@...-semaphore.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> There should be no dependencies. When the OF GPIO support is not
>>>> selected linux/of_gpio.h will define of_get_gpio() as a stub, so  
>>>> the
>>>> fs_enet driver will fall back to the legacy binding.
>>>
>>> Have we reached a consensus on which tree the patch should go to ?
>> I think it should go through powerpc tree, not seeing too much
>> netdev-generic stuff in here. If noone will object, Kumar will pick  
>> it up I
>> guess...
>
> Kumar, could you pick it up ? I'd like to see this in 2.6.27.
>
> Best regards,

Jeff said he applied both to his tree already.

- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html