netdev - Re: [RFC 2/2] TCP: Add TCP-AO support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <396556a20807181922t32c05b86l335de10bd1106ab2@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:22:35 -0700
From:	"Adam Langley" <agl@...erialviolet.org>
To:	"YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明" 
	<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] TCP: Add TCP-AO support

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 6:28 PM, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org> wrote:
> Again, is it okay to add/del one key per each operation?

Yes, I believe so. (At least I can't think of a situation where it isn't)

> If yes, we do not need to change current API too much.

I think, if we're only supporting two keys, the API in the patch (save
making the flags wider etc) is good.

If the concenous is that we need to support > 2 keys per address, then
I'll have a think.

AGL

-- 
Adam Langley agl@...erialviolet.org http://www.imperialviolet.org