[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48821DEF.1040306@candelatech.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:01:35 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG, NET] deadlock tearing down a bridged interface
Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 08:44:58AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>> Dave Chinner wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I just deadlocked networking on a 2.6.24 kernel. Basically I
>>> was trying to restart the bridge interface I use for UML sessions
>>> because it wasn't passing packets. This happens occasionally
>>> when I leave a UML session too long in gdb, so I bounced the
>>> bridge to get it working again.
>>>
>>>
>> We have been chasing a refcount bug in 2.6.25 that only happens when
>> IPv6 module is loaded.
>>
>
> Which causes what problem? The deadlock I reported or the bridge occasionally
> hanging? Is that a problem in 2.6.24?
>
> The deadlock is the one I'm concerned about - it appears that
> netdev_run_todo() can only wait on a single interface at a time,
> so if we are tearing down two interfaces concurrently where one
> has a reference on the other a deadlock is just waiting to happen...
>
Our problem is the refcount hang while trying to remove a netdevice. It
appears
to be an ipv6 related leakage of some sort, and not directly related to
bridges.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists