netdev - Re: [PATCH 20/31]: pkt_sched: Perform bulk of qdisc destruction in RCU.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080721.094524.152820749.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	hadi@...erus.ca
Cc:	kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, johannes@...solutions.net,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/31]: pkt_sched: Perform bulk of qdisc destruction in
 RCU.

From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:20:01 -0400

> Actually, can i modify that thought and go back to my initial contention
> now that things are making more sense?;->
> A single s/ware queue per hardware transmit queue is good - but that
> being pfifo_fast would be a lot better. It would, in the minimal, keep
> things as they were for non-multiq and is a sane choice for any virtual
> wire.

Ok, I'll revert the change that changed pfifo_fast into plain fifo_fast.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html