[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080721131918.GA11114@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:19:18 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
johannes@...solutions.net, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/31]: pkt_sched: Perform bulk of qdisc destruction in RCU.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:08:44AM -0400, jamal wrote:
>
> The one thing i am unsure of still:
> I think it would be cleaner to just stop a single queue (instead of all)
> when one hardware queue fills up. i.e if there is no congestion on the
> other hardware queues, packets should continue to be fed to their
> hardware queues and not be buffered at qdisc level.
Right you don't necessarily have to stop all queues but you do
need to direct all packets into the qdisc.
> Parallelization would work if you can get X CPUs to send to X hardware
> queues concurently. Feasible in static host setup like virtualization
> environment where you can tie a vm to a cpu. Not very feasible in
> routing where you are driven to a random hardware tx queue by arriving
> packets.
It should work just fine for routing assuming your card does
multi-queue RX.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists