lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	vegard.nossum@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NET_KEY defaults to N

From: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:52:14 +0200

> Hi,
> 
> There's one thing I keep wondering about:
> 
> CONFIG_NET_KEY has this help text:
> 
>   │ PF_KEYv2 socket family, compatible to KAME ones.
>   │ They are required if you are going to use IPsec tools ported
>   │ from KAME.
>   │
>   │ Say Y unless you know what you are doing.
> 
> It defaults to N, however.
> 
> Which one is wrong, the help-text or the default? Should it be changed?

We'd like it to default to 'y' but only if the user has turned
on IPSEC via XFRM already.

Unfortunately, we can't do that so easily here because we
always present this option and it simply selects XFRM if you
enable it.

The help text isn't accurate either.  You currently need
NET_KEY even for openswan because we (still) lack a way to
probe the algorithm lists with netlink alone.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ