[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080722153443.GB18757@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:34:43 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [TCP bug] stuck distcc connections in latest -git
* David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com> wrote:
> >
> >> You really should start that capture, and on both client and server.
> >> You don't need to dump everything, only traffic to or from
> >> server:distcc.
> >>
> >
> > It's not feasible. That box did in excess of 200 GB of network traffic
> > in the past 7 hours alone.
>
> You only need distcc traffic, and perhaps only after it's hung. With
> 250k outstanding per socket, are you certain that no traffic was sent?
> Is it certain that one packet wasn't being sent each three minutes? I
> suppose you're right and the stack really is stuck, but this is such
> an easy thing to check and eliminate that you should do so. I
> suppose, too, that you should trace the server-side processes and
> confirm that they are waiting for socket input. You should dump tcp
> (for the distcc port) next time the problem recurs and also check that
> the server processes are waiting for socket input.
ok, will do that if it happens again.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists