netdev - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11144] New: dhcp doesn't work with iwl4965

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:17:27 +0200
From:	François Valenduc 
	<francois.valenduc@...ablenet.be>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11144] New: dhcp doesn't work with iwl4965

Andrew Morton a écrit :
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:58:21 +0200 Fran__ois Valenduc <francois.valenduc@...ablenet.be> wrote:
>
>   
>> P.S: why don't you want to use the bugzilla interface ?
>>     
>
> Depends on the subsystem.  ACPI is 100% bugzilla-based, net people 
> prefer email, others are in-between.
>
> Plus for recently-occurring bugs it's best to knock them over via email
> without getting into bugzilla bureaucracy.  bugzilla is more
> appropriate to longer-term bugs.
>
> And when the bug affects multiple subsystems, multiple
> developers and we don't even know which subsystem introduced it, it is
> much better to perform the diagnosis and repair via email.
>
>
> I make a judgement call on each report.  Been doing it for a while,
> don't get too many complaints ;)
>
>
>   
OK, thanks for the explanation. But do you have more ideas about the 
problem ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html