netdev - Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] net: per skb control messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200807250049.46939.opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:49:46 +0300
From:	Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] net: per skb control messages

On Thursday 24 July 2008, David Miller wrote:

> Adding new fields to struct sk_buff that take up space is generally
> not allowed unless the new field adds substantially to the benefit of
> a large group of users of Linus.
>
> I don't think that applied here for this hw-tstamps stuff.

What about the approach proposed in the patch? Is it ok to add a pointer which 
may resolve other future similar issues?

Thanks,
tavi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html