netdev - Re: Kernel WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1330 __netif

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1217014575.4758.7.camel@johannes.berg>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:36:15 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Oeser <netdev@...eo.de>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	peterz@...radead.org, Larry.Finger@...inger.net, kaber@...sh.net,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Kernel WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1330
	__netif_schedule+0x2c/0x98()

On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 21:34 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:

> > Umm, of course it cannot, because then we'd have to take the mutex in
> > the TX path, which we cannot. We cannot have another lock in the TX
> > path, what's so hard to understand about? We need to be able to lock all
> > queues to lock out multiple tx paths at once in some (really) slow paths
> > but not have any extra lock overhead for the tx path, especially not a
> > single lock.
> 
> But this mutex doesn't have to be mutex. And it's not for the tx path,
> only for "service" just like netif_tx_lock(). The fast path needs only
> queue->tx_lock.

No, we need to be able to lock out multiple TX paths at once.

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)