[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080725105748.GB10399@ff.dom.local>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:57:48 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@...et.fi>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] net_sched: Add accessor function for packet
length for qdiscs
On 20-07-2008 01:35, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@...et.fi>
...
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_cbq.c b/net/sched/sch_cbq.c
> index 1afe3ee..f1d2f8e 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_cbq.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_cbq.c
> @@ -370,7 +370,6 @@ static int
> cbq_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch)
> {
> struct cbq_sched_data *q = qdisc_priv(sch);
> - int len = skb->len;
> int uninitialized_var(ret);
> struct cbq_class *cl = cbq_classify(skb, sch, &ret);
>
> @@ -391,7 +390,7 @@ cbq_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch)
> if (ret == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) {
> sch->q.qlen++;
> sch->bstats.packets++;
> - sch->bstats.bytes+=len;
> + sch->bstats.bytes += qdisc_pkt_len(skb);
Alas I didn't manage to read this earlier, but this type of changes
here and elsewhere in this patch looks wrong to me: we shouldn't
use skb pointer after ->enqueue().
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists