[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080725113757.GC10399@ff.dom.local>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:37:57 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: jussi.kivilinna@...et.fi, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] net_sched: Add accessor function for packet
length for qdiscs
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 03:57:12AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:57:48 +0000
>
> > On 20-07-2008 01:35, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@...et.fi>
> > ...
> > > diff --git a/net/sched/sch_cbq.c b/net/sched/sch_cbq.c
> > > index 1afe3ee..f1d2f8e 100644
> > > --- a/net/sched/sch_cbq.c
> > > +++ b/net/sched/sch_cbq.c
> > > @@ -370,7 +370,6 @@ static int
> > > cbq_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch)
> > > {
> > > struct cbq_sched_data *q = qdisc_priv(sch);
> > > - int len = skb->len;
> > > int uninitialized_var(ret);
> > > struct cbq_class *cl = cbq_classify(skb, sch, &ret);
> > >
> > > @@ -391,7 +390,7 @@ cbq_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch)
> > > if (ret == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) {
> > > sch->q.qlen++;
> > > sch->bstats.packets++;
> > > - sch->bstats.bytes+=len;
> > > + sch->bstats.bytes += qdisc_pkt_len(skb);
> >
> > Alas I didn't manage to read this earlier, but this type of changes
> > here and elsewhere in this patch looks wrong to me: we shouldn't
> > use skb pointer after ->enqueue().
>
> It should be OK here, we have the root qdisc locked, so nobody
> can remove it from the queue and if we got NET_XMIT_SUCCESS that
> thing must not have been freed.
>
> And anyways, we can't know the qdisc_pkt_len() until the enqueue
> fucntion has been called.
OK, I see htb did this earlier with ".packets", so it looks like I'm
wrong with this - sorry! (Anyway, it seems to unnecessarily restrict
the way qdisc are working.)
> Even TCP depends upon that NET_XMIT_* return value having some real
> meaning, remember the HTB bug we tracked down last week? :-)
Do you mean this bug you've forgotten to fix yet?
Thanks,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists