netdev - Re: sendfile() behavior while troubleshooting netdevice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <488F1BF2.8090009@bellsouth.net>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:32:34 -0500
From:	"J. K. Cliburn" <jcliburn@...il.com>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, ian@...fray.co.uk
Subject: Re: sendfile() behavior while troubleshooting netdevice

Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Hi Jay.
> 
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 07:07:07PM -0500, Jay Cliburn (jacliburn@...lsouth.net) wrote:
>> sendfile() + TSO + atl1 driver == corrupted file at the receiver
> 
> ...
> 
>> The hosts:
>> server, petrel,  r8169, 192.168.1.6,   2.6.20-1.2320.fc5
>> client, sparrow, e100,  192.168.1.195, 2.6.25.6-27.fc8
> 
> ...
> 
>> [jcliburn@...rrow ~]$ ./sfcli 192.168.1.6 testfile
>> connected...
>> file size is 1600 bytes
>> received 1592 bytes
>> error: expected 1600, received 1592
> 
> I.e. trouble also happens with r8169 driver?
> 

I think you may be right, Evgeniy.  I thought I had tested things using 
e100 as the server side, but apparently I didn't.  If I run the server 
from the e100 host, it works flawlessly every time.  (But of course, the 
NIC doesn't support TSO, either.)

More testing tonight...

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html