lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080730151316.a4d76fe9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:13:16 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
	jeff@...zik.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mpm@...enic.com
Subject: Re: [patch 12/12] Configure out ethtool support

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:48:12 -0700
> 
> > But I do think we should see some evidence that people are actually
> > using CONFIG_ETHTOOL=n in real setups.
> 
> Heaven help them if they want to debug any real problems that
> might involve checksumming, TSO, and other offload features.
> Heaven help them if they want to probe the driver or firmware
> version of the card they are using.

Presumably they would enable ethtool (and a whole bunch of other
debugging things) during development.  In previous lives I've seen
development boards which have double the memory of production boards
simply so that the developers can get their work done.

> I'm sure you can find someone who runs with CONFIG_STAND_ON_MY_HEAD=y
> but that doesn't mean that supporting such an option upstream makes
> any sense.

Well yes, embedded developers do patch the hell out of their kernels
and presumably they will always do so.  The idea here is to bring
things inwards to reduce the amount of patching which these people need
to do.

If they don't do this then tens of millions of devices will be burdened
with many kilobytes of code which they will never ever need.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ