[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080807120536.GA13299@ff.dom.local>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:05:37 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@...et.fi>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kaber@...sh.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: qdisc_enqueue, NET_XMIT_SUCCESS and kfree_skb
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 02:36:54PM +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
> Quoting "Jarek Poplawski" <jarkao2@...il.com>:
>
>> There is also some doubt about differences between ->enqueue() and
>> ->requeue() wrt. kfree_skb() and returning codes: maybe it would be
>> better (for uniformity) to add similar changes to requeues (and
>> dev_requeue_skb()) as well?
>>
>
> I think requeue should be changed to return same as enqueue, netem even
> uses requeue as enqueue replacement for packet reordering. Maybe add
> new function qdisc_requeue_tree to handle freeing and masking flags and
> change outside uses of requeue to use it (qdisc_peek_len in hfsc,
> sch_atm_dequeue, dev_requeue_skb).
Yes, good point again: if ->enqueue() could be mixed with ->requeue()
there is more than uniformity argument to do the change everywhere.
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists