[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080809014925.GA26529@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 09:49:25 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Wolfgang Walter <wolfgang.walter@...m.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
vegard.nossum@...il.com
Subject: Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably problem with fpu state changes
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 12:01:15PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> It's technically overkill, if (and only if!) these instructions don't
> actually touch the SSE state (most likely they're using the SSE
> pipeline, and need this stuff to deal with power management issues.)
Yes the PadLock uses the SSE pipeline, but doesn't touch any
of the state.
> However, overkill is a good way to make sure something is dead.
> Applying the patch will make sure we fix the regression, and we can
> worry about optimizing this further post-2.6.27.
Do we really need the FPU changes right now? I'd prefer for that
to be backed out until a proper solution is found. Disabling
preemption around crypto is really bad for scheduling latency.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists