lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:52:48 -0700
From:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Wolfgang Walter <wolfgang.walter@...m.de>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"viro@...IV.linux.org.uk" <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	"vegard.nossum@...il.com" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
	austin zhang <austin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably problem with fpu state changes

On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 07:32:59AM -0700, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 10:29:18PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > OK I take that back, Intel (and AMD) processors are equally affected
> > by this.  For a start, the newly added Intel crc32c driver suffers
> > from exactly the same problem since the instruction used is also
> > SSE.
> 
> Actually I was mistaken, Intel has done the right thing by not
> generating a fault on crc32c with TS set.

Yes, the documentation seems to says so. But I am double checking
with experts inside, to make sure we got the SDM right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists