[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080811225709.GO13158@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:57:09 -0700
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Wolfgang Walter <wolfgang.walter@...m.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"viro@...IV.linux.org.uk" <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"vegard.nossum@...il.com" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
austin zhang <austin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably problem with fpu state changes
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 10:41:48PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 10:52:48AM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> >>> Actually I was mistaken, Intel has done the right thing by not
> >>> generating a fault on crc32c with TS set.
> >> Yes, the documentation seems to says so. But I am double checking
> >> with experts inside, to make sure we got the SDM right.
I got confirmation that crc32 instructions don't generate DNA when cr0.TS bit
is set. So no changes required for Austin's patches in this context.
thanks,
suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists