| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:17:19 +0200 From: Ingo Oeser <netdev@...eo.de> To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, anthony@...emonkey.ws, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: csum offload and af_packet Herbert Xu schrieb: > The only time you need this is when you have an old guest that > you cannot modify. If you could modify it you can always give it > a patched DHCP client (I've alread patched dhcp-client for Xen > so that should work properly for KVM/lguest if you're using the > latest version). Are you talking about modifying the KVM client image? There may be reasons, why this is impossible or at least highly undesired. Before virtualisation developers of embedded stuff need to seal away their whole machines for their development and test environment together with sample hardware. Now using virtualisation they can at least virtualize their development and test environment, save lots of cost and not risking that their sealed away hardware will not start again, when they need to fix a critical bug 10-20 years later. Now try to have them change the KVM client image :-) Extreme special case, not worth optimizing for, I know. But that special case is a legal one like any other special case we care about now. Best Regards Ingo Oeser -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists