netdev - Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jarkao2@...il.com
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().

From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:50:52 +0000

> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 08:42:38PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:27:01AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > > 
> > > - in net_tx_action() we can hit a place just after clear_bit() where
> > > none of these bits is set. Of course, hitting this 2 times in a row
> > > seems to be very unprobable, yet possible, and a lock isn't helpful
> > > here, so probably some change around this would make this nicer.
> > >
> > > - isn't there possible some longer ping-pong between qdic_run() and
> > > net_tx_action() when dev_requeue_skb() would get it back to
> > > __netif_schedule() and so on (with NETDEV_TX_BUSY)?
> > 
> > Good point.  I think we should add an aliveness check in both
> > net_tx_action and qdisc_run.  In fact the net_tx_action problem
> > existed previously as well.  But it is pretty darn unlikely.
> 
> Yes, it seems qdisc_reset() doesn't have to help with this, so
> probably there is needed some requeue counter or something...

Ok, so what I'm going to do is check in my patch and then try
to figure out how to resolve this "both bits clear" scenerio.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html