[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080813.192101.221940876.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: alex.williamson@...com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, buytenh@...vell.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11316] New: severe performance regression for
iptables nat routing
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:08:20 -0600
> git bisect traced the problem back to this changeset:
>
> commit e5a4a72d4f88f4389e9340d383ca67031d1b8536
> Author: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...vell.com>
> Date: Sun Aug 3 01:23:10 2008 -0700
>
> net: use software GSO for SG+CSUM capable netdevices
>
> I've verified that I can toggle the slowness by reverting this patch on
> top of 8d0968ab (current head). The problem is readily reproducible
> using Ubuntu Hardy in a KVM VM with upstream, defconfig kernel.
Patrick I wonder if there a case where iptables NAT will COW the packet
when it really doesn't need to.
It seems, if anything, using GSO should make things go a little bit
faster not slower... Hmmm...
Anyways, if we can't figure this one out soon we can easily revert.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists