[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080814083336.GA452@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:33:36 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:31:27AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> I'm not sure of your point... This patch is only to fix my yesterday's
> doubt #1, and it doesn't introduce, I hope, any new live-lock
> vulnerabity. So, if you mean doubt #2, there is needed a separate
> patch, but I'm not sure there is a need to add a flag. I've thougt
> about a counter in a Qdisc for consecutive requeues with
> netif_schedule, so we could break after some limit. Of course, your
> idea could be simpler and better, but if I could only see some code...
What I mean is the extremely unlikely scenario of net_tx_action
always failing on trylock because dev_deactivate has grabbed the
lock to check whether net_tx_action has completed.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists