[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080817.143444.252525600.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jarkao2@...il.com
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
denys@...p.net.lb
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 15:42:54 +0200
> Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 08/14/2008 01:24 PM:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 03:19:18PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > ...
> >> Ok, so what I'm going to do is check in my patch and then try
> >> to figure out how to resolve this "both bits clear" scenerio.
> >
> > BTW, here is my older doubt revisited, where I hope to be re-considered/
> > re-convinced, if possible...
>
>
> After problems while testing this by Denys in another thread
> I withdraw this patch.
Well, I knew it was completely wrong from the beginning, sorry
to say :-)
This stuff can't be done outside of RCU, period. I moved all of this
work into RCU for a reason, I really meant it, and none of the reasons
for that move have changed :-)
If we want to do it under RTNL we have to do something like schedule a
workqueue from the RCU handler and then take the RTNL there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists