netdev - Re: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48A98867.1010806@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:34:15 -0500
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
CC:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ilpo Järvinen 
	<ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28

Ray Lee wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Christoph Lameter
> <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>>
>>> Other regressions on other machines are similar.
>> There are AIM7 regressions that are similar to tbench.
>>
>> 2.6.22  28436
>> 2.6.26  23064
> 
> Just a shot in the dark -- is this with Group Scheduling on or off?
> Off is prefered for benchmarks.

Off
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html