netdev - Re: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1219107706.8781.6.camel@ymzhang>
Date:	Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:01:46 +0800
From:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28


On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 09:07 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> 
> > Other regressions on other machines are similar.
> 
> There are AIM7 regressions that are similar to tbench.
> 
> 2.6.22	28436
> 2.6.26	23064

Mostly, AIM7 has about 4~5% regression on my machines. As AIM7 result is stable,
so 4% is big. 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html