[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <452065.84245.qm@web82105.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Witbrodt <dawitbro@...global.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- connection between HPET and lockups found
> Just to make sure: on a working kernel, do you get the HPET messages?
> I.e. does the hpet truly work in that case?
On the "fileserver", where 2.6.25 works but 2.6.26 locks up, the HPET
_does_ work on a working kernel:
$ uname -r
2.6.26.revert1
$ dmesg | grep -i hpet
ACPI: HPET 77FE80C0, 0038 (r1 RS690 AWRDACPI 42302E31 AWRD 98)
ACPI: HPET id: 0x10b9a201 base: 0xfed00000
hpet clockevent registered
hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 0, 0
hpet0: 4 32-bit timers, 14318180 Hz
hpet_resources: 0xfed00000 is busy
What I didn't realize is that the "desktop" machine, where 2.6.26 has
always "worked", does NOT have a working HPET after all, even though
I have enabled all HPET options in .config:
$ uname -r
2.6.26.080801.desktop.uvesafb
$ dmesg | grep -i hpet
$
This means I misunderstood my situation on "desktop". I believed HPET
was working on all of my machines, but now I am not certain that it
ever worked on "desktop" since I built it (May 2007). The question
never arose before, and because I enabled the HPET option in .config,
I just assumed that HPET was working. (Duh...) I failed to look into
this until now.
At any rate, my subject line is still accurate: there _is_ an HPET
regression on "fileserver" (and "webserver"), since it worked on
2.6.25 kernels but causes lockups on 2.6.2[67] kernels.
(I don't know what is going on with "desktop": does the motherboard
lack HPET, or does the Linux kernel not support the HPET hardware on
the motherboard?)
BTW: the 'dmesg' output above is the same on "desktop" with 2.6.25
and 2.6.26 -- I just checked to be sure. For "fileserver", I checked
an old 2.6.25 kernel just now, and the output is identical.
Another experiment: I just tried this...
static __init int hpet_insert_resource(void)
{
- if (!hpet_res)
+ /* if (!hpet_res) */
return 1;
- return insert_resource(&iomem_resource, hpet_res);
+ /* return insert_resource(&iomem_resource, hpet_res); */
}
... and the lock up still occurs. So, the memory is allocated but
the resource info is not inserted into the tree. Whether the
dynamic memory for hpet_res is being damaged or not has no bearing
on the lockups, it would seem. Looks like I was barking up the
wrong tree....
Dave W.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists