[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080821.050619.15769132.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 05:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jarkao2@...il.com
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
denys@...p.net.lb
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:55:22 +0000
> Sure, here is a scenario:
>
> cpu1 cpu2
> rtnl_lock()
> qdisc_graft()
> // parent != NULL
> ->cops-graft()
> notify_and_destroy() qdisc_run()
> spin_lock(root_lock)
> qdisc_destroy(old) dequeue_skb()
> tbf_dequeue()
> qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen()
> qdisc_lookup()
> //deleting from qdisc_sleeping->list //walking qdisc_sleeping->list
> //under rtnl_lock() only //under qdisc root_lock only
> list_del(qdisc->list) list_for_each_entry(txq_root)
Grrr... :-)
Note that this only happens when my arch nemesis, ->requeue(), fails.
Same applies to the netem case, and hfsc's "peek".
All other qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen() users hold RTNL.
Really, it proves ->requeue() should die, and be replaced with "peek"
and "unlink" methods.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists