[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48AD6DBB.9030607@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:29:31 -0400
From: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
To: Julius Volz <juliusv@...gle.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
horms@...ge.net.au, kaber@...sh.net, vbusam@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 08/24] IPVS: Make protocol handler functions support
IPv6
Julius Volz wrote:
> +void
> +ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
> + const struct sk_buff *skb,
> + int offset,
> + const char *msg)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
> + if (skb->protocol == __constant_htons(ETH_P_IPV6))
> + ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet_v6(pp, skb, offset, msg);
> + else
> +#endif
I don't think you need the __constant_htons() here, just htons() -
that's what tcp_ipv6.c does.
> +static void
> +ah_debug_packet(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp, const struct sk_buff *skb,
> + int offset, const char *msg)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
> + if (skb->protocol == __constant_htons(ETH_P_IPV6))
> + ah_debug_packet_v6(pp, skb, offset, msg);
> + else
> +#endif
htons()
> +static void
> +esp_debug_packet(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp, const struct sk_buff *skb,
> + int offset, const char *msg)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
> + if (skb->protocol == __constant_htons(ETH_P_IPV6))
> + esp_debug_packet_v6(pp, skb, offset, msg);
> + else
> +#endif
htons()
I think there's more in one of the other patches too.
So why can't you just create one ip_vs_debug_packet_v6() instead of
these ah and esp ones which are identical?
-Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists