| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1219437509-10048-1-git-send-email-ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:38:27 +0300
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/3] tcp: Add tcp_validate_incoming & put duplicated code there
Large block of code duplication removed.
Sadly, the return value thing is a bit tricky here but it
seems the most sensible way to return positive from validator
on success rather than negative.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 4f1cc0e..aa95c68 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -4696,6 +4696,67 @@ out:
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NET_DMA */
+/* Does PAWS and seqno based validation of an incoming segment, flags will
+ * play significant role here.
+ */
+static int tcp_validate_incoming(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct tcphdr *th, int syn_inerr)
+{
+ struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
+
+ /* RFC1323: H1. Apply PAWS check first. */
+ if (tcp_fast_parse_options(skb, th, tp) && tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp &&
+ tcp_paws_discard(sk, skb)) {
+ if (!th->rst) {
+ NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_PAWSESTABREJECTED);
+ tcp_send_dupack(sk, skb);
+ goto discard;
+ }
+ /* Reset is accepted even if it did not pass PAWS. */
+ }
+
+ /* Step 1: check sequence number */
+ if (!tcp_sequence(tp, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq)) {
+ /* RFC793, page 37: "In all states except SYN-SENT, all reset
+ * (RST) segments are validated by checking their SEQ-fields."
+ * And page 69: "If an incoming segment is not acceptable,
+ * an acknowledgment should be sent in reply (unless the RST
+ * bit is set, if so drop the segment and return)".
+ */
+ if (!th->rst)
+ tcp_send_dupack(sk, skb);
+ goto discard;
+ }
+
+ /* Step 2: check RST bit */
+ if (th->rst) {
+ tcp_reset(sk);
+ goto discard;
+ }
+
+ /* ts_recent update must be made after we are sure that the packet
+ * is in window.
+ */
+ tcp_replace_ts_recent(tp, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);
+
+ /* step 3: check security and precedence [ignored] */
+
+ /* step 4: Check for a SYN in window. */
+ if (th->syn && !before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tp->rcv_nxt)) {
+ if (syn_inerr)
+ TCP_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), TCP_MIB_INERRS);
+ NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPABORTONSYN);
+ tcp_reset(sk);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ return 1;
+
+discard:
+ __kfree_skb(skb);
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* TCP receive function for the ESTABLISHED state.
*
@@ -4723,6 +4784,7 @@ int tcp_rcv_established(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct tcphdr *th, unsigned len)
{
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
+ int res;
/*
* Header prediction.
@@ -4904,51 +4966,12 @@ slow_path:
goto csum_error;
/*
- * RFC1323: H1. Apply PAWS check first.
- */
- if (tcp_fast_parse_options(skb, th, tp) && tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp &&
- tcp_paws_discard(sk, skb)) {
- if (!th->rst) {
- NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_PAWSESTABREJECTED);
- tcp_send_dupack(sk, skb);
- goto discard;
- }
- /* Resets are accepted even if PAWS failed.
-
- ts_recent update must be made after we are sure
- that the packet is in window.
- */
- }
-
- /*
* Standard slow path.
*/
- if (!tcp_sequence(tp, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq)) {
- /* RFC793, page 37: "In all states except SYN-SENT, all reset
- * (RST) segments are validated by checking their SEQ-fields."
- * And page 69: "If an incoming segment is not acceptable,
- * an acknowledgment should be sent in reply (unless the RST bit
- * is set, if so drop the segment and return)".
- */
- if (!th->rst)
- tcp_send_dupack(sk, skb);
- goto discard;
- }
-
- if (th->rst) {
- tcp_reset(sk);
- goto discard;
- }
-
- tcp_replace_ts_recent(tp, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);
-
- if (th->syn && !before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tp->rcv_nxt)) {
- TCP_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), TCP_MIB_INERRS);
- NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPABORTONSYN);
- tcp_reset(sk);
- return 1;
- }
+ res = tcp_validate_incoming(sk, skb, th, 1);
+ if (res <= 0)
+ return -res;
step5:
if (th->ack)
@@ -5230,6 +5253,7 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
int queued = 0;
+ int res;
tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
@@ -5282,42 +5306,9 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
return 0;
}
- if (tcp_fast_parse_options(skb, th, tp) && tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp &&
- tcp_paws_discard(sk, skb)) {
- if (!th->rst) {
- NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_PAWSESTABREJECTED);
- tcp_send_dupack(sk, skb);
- goto discard;
- }
- /* Reset is accepted even if it did not pass PAWS. */
- }
-
- /* step 1: check sequence number */
- if (!tcp_sequence(tp, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq)) {
- if (!th->rst)
- tcp_send_dupack(sk, skb);
- goto discard;
- }
-
- /* step 2: check RST bit */
- if (th->rst) {
- tcp_reset(sk);
- goto discard;
- }
-
- tcp_replace_ts_recent(tp, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);
-
- /* step 3: check security and precedence [ignored] */
-
- /* step 4:
- *
- * Check for a SYN in window.
- */
- if (th->syn && !before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tp->rcv_nxt)) {
- NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPABORTONSYN);
- tcp_reset(sk);
- return 1;
- }
+ res = tcp_validate_incoming(sk, skb, th, 0);
+ if (res <= 0)
+ return -res;
/* step 5: check the ACK field */
if (th->ack) {
--
1.5.2.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists