[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080822183224.2d52f16c@tux>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:32:24 -0300
From: Dâniel Fraga <fragabr@...il.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, thomas.jarosch@...ra2net.com,
billfink@...dspring.com, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Patrick Hardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp FRTO: in-order-only "TCP proxy" fragility
workaround
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:37:13 +0300 (EEST)
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi> wrote:
> Based on irc discussion with davem, there is a htb bug which can cause
> corruption of the retransmitted TCP packets (and then a discard due to
> checksum mismatch). That would also explain the strange headers I noticed
> earlier. There's a patch below (should apply to 2.6.26), please put it at
> least on the host(s) which use htb (I don't know if both server and the
> client do use wondershaper script or just the client). An different
> failure symptoms (one could be somehow frto related as FRTO is used while
> retransmitting) are also quite well explainable.
>
> But FRTO is mostly not a suspect based on the tcpdump you provided (no
> FRTO workaround would help in that).
Ilpo, I have good news. I decided to disable completely HTB and
the problem seems to have gone. And frto is enabled, of course. So the
problem was with HTB, not frto as I thought.
The HTB patches you provided are going to be included in the
next 2.6.27 kernel, right?
Thank you.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists