[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080822100708.GA14345@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:07:08 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: jarkao2@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, denys@...p.net.lb
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 01:55:13AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> > > We've got at least the RX and TX queues. That makes two locks and
> > > two lists.
> >
> > RX currently doesn't add anything to the list.
>
> That's correct, currently ingress qdiscs only support a hierarchy of
> single root and that's it.
We seem to be talking about different things.
Yes the ingress hierachy has a single root, i.e., it's a tree. But
that has nothing to do with what I was talking about. I'm talking
about the list at dev->rx_queue.qdisc_sleeping->list which is
certainly not guaranteed to be empty.
If you look at qdisc_create you'll find that every time we create
a non-root ingress qdisc we add it to that list (we have to,
otherwise qdisc_lookup doesn't work at all for ingress qdiscs).
So when somebody on the TX side does a qdisc_lookup they may be
walking the RX list without any protection. Similarly, if somebody
on the ingress side does qdisc_lookup they may walk the TX lists
without protection.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists