netdev - RE: [PATCH 4/4 2.6.28] cxgb3i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46A00B48CC54E4468EF6911F877AC4CA018D73C1@blrx3m10.blr.amer.dell.com>
Date:	Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:40:45 +0530
From:	<Shyam_Iyer@...l.com>
To:	<davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <kxie@...lsio.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <open-iscsi@...glegroups.com>,
	<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<jgarzik@...ox.com>, <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
	<swise@...ngridcomputing.com>, <rdreier@...co.com>,
	<daisyc@...ibm.com>, <wenxiong@...ibm.com>, <bhua@...ibm.com>,
	<divy@...lsio.com>, <dm@...lsio.com>, <leedom@...lsio.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/4 2.6.28] cxgb3i - cxgb3i iscsi driver

>Look, what you're suggesting is to change existing practice and that
doesn't belong in the discussion of the review of a specific driver.
>If you want to bring that up as a topic and change globally how that is
handled, bring that up as a seperate topic on linux-kernel.

Sounds reasonable.

>Don't bug the poor driver submitter who is just following existing and
accepted practice.

That wasn't the intention here. It rose out of the discussion that was
being suggested that DRV_MODULE_VERSION be removed and I don't think
should be done.
So, I suggested a followup suggestion from there. Will take that up as
you suggested.

-Shyam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html