[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080822.173625.182460185.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shemminger@...tta.com
Cc: opurdila@...acom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] ip: skip IP checksum for skbs with
CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY set
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:33:20 -0400
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:24:31 +0300
> Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > We are working on a completely in hardware LRO implementation and this patch
> > would simplify the hardware implementation. Is this acceptable?
> >
> > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
> > @@ -415,7 +415,8 @@ int ip_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct packet_type *pt,
> >
> > iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> >
> > - if (unlikely(ip_fast_csum((u8 *)iph, iph->ihl)))
> > + if (!skb_csum_unnecessary(skb) &&
> > + unlikely(ip_fast_csum((u8 *)iph, iph->ihl)))
> > goto inhdr_error;
> >
> > len = ntohs(iph->tot_len);
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> The overhead of the additional conditional might outweigh any benefit.
I don't think they want this for performance, they want to not have to
compute the IP header checksum in their HW LRO implementation, which
is just as silly :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists