netdev - Re: [PATCH 20/38] netns ct: NOTRACK in netns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0808232034380.8996@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:35:07 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	adobriyan@...il.com
cc:	kaber@...sh.net, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/38] netns ct: NOTRACK in netns


On Friday 2008-08-22 07:30, adobriyan@...il.com wrote:
>
>We wait for untracked ct refcount to drop to 1 back:
>
>	/* wait until all references to nf_conntrack_untracked are dropped */
>	while (atomic_read(&nf_conntrack_untracked.ct_general.use) > 1)
>		schedule();
>
>Consequently it should be one per netns, otherwise netns A can prevent
>netns B from stopping.
>

But nf_conntrack_cleanup is not per netns, is it?
At least I do not think it should be.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html