[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080824191905.GA3372@ami.dom.local>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:19:05 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, jeff@...zik.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pkt_sched: restore multiqueue prio scheduler
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:39:23AM -0400, jamal wrote:
...
> With current controls being per qdisc instead of per netdevice,
> the hol fear is unfounded.
> You send and when hw cant keep up, you block just the one hwqueue.
> While hwqueue is blocked, you can accumulate packets in the prio qdisc
> (hence my statement it may not be necessary to accumulate packets in
> driver).
Jamal, maybe I miss something, but this could be like this only with
default pfifo_fast qdiscs, which really are per dev hwqueue. Other
qdiscs, including prio, are per device, so with prio, if a band with
the highest priority is blocked it would be requeued blocking other
bands (hwqueues in Alexander's case).
Cheers,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists